Monday, June 18, 2018

Google researchers shed light on state-sponsored attacks targeting news orgs

Google researchers shed light on state-sponsored attacks targeting news orgs

Google researchers shed light on state-sponsored attacks targeting news orgs

At the Black Hat hacking conference in Singapore, security engineers at Google pointed out the high incidence with which state-sponsored attacks targeted major news organizations.

On Friday, Shane Huntley and Morgan Marquis-Boire at Google, told Reuters that 21 of the world's top 25 media companies were on the receiving end of these attacks aimed at journalists.The duo presented on the topic this week at a session called, "Tomorrow's News is Today's Intel: Journalists as Targets and Compromise Vectors."

"If you're a journalist or a journalist organization, we will see state-sponsored targeting and we see it happening regardless of region…," Huntley told Reuters.

The state-sponsored threats, often leveraged via malicious emails, were reportedly tracked via Google's monitoring of attacks on users.

On Friday, SCMagazine.com reached out to Marquis-Boire and Huntley, but not immediately receive comment.



Elyssa D. Durant 
Research & Policy Analyst
Columbia University, New York

NARA - AAD - Terminology

NARA - AAD - Terminology

Yahoo still in court. Amazon still owns everything and my work being published in Singapore and censored by the Palm Beach Post. 





NARA - AAD - Terminology

Abolish Date: The date on which an organization was terminated, disbanded, inactivated, or superseded. The date may be qualified by a "ca." to indicate if the date is approximate or a "?" if an uncertainty exists regarding the date.

Access Restrictions: Information about restrictions that may affect your access to the archival materials. Access to all or part of the archival materials may be restricted based on national security considerations, donor restrictions, court orders, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) exemptions, or other statutory or regulatory provisions.

Agency Note: Comments or notes that the creating organization provided to describe the contents of a column or data element within a file.

Archival Description: See description.

Archival Materials: Records, personal papers, and artifacts in any form or media created, received, or accumulated by a person or organization in the course of official business and preserved because of their continuing value.

ca.: An abbreviation for the term "circa." Used if a date is approximate.

Circa: Abbreviated as "ca." Used if a date is approximate.

Coded Value: Numbers and/or letters that represent a meaning within a particular field. For example, the coded values for the field "Sex of Person" might be "M" and "F" representing "Male" and "Female." The list of all codes and their meanings is contained in a Code List next to each relevant field.

Code List: A list of all coded values for a particular field and the meanings they represent. A code list can be associated with multiple columns in a single data file or multiple data files.

Collection: 1) Archival materials, regardless of form or media, organically created and/or accumulated and used by a particular person, family, or non-governmental organization in the conduct of personal or organizational activity. 2) An artificial accumulation of archival materials brought together on the basis of some characteristic (such as means of acquisition, creator, subject, language, media, form, name of collector) without regard to the provenance of the archival materials.

Collection Identifier: A unique identifier assigned to a collection of archival materials.

Contributors: Names of organizations or people, other than the archival creator, who are responsible for the intellectual, technical, artistic, or financial production of the archival materials, such as contractor, distributor, programmer, or originator.

Coverage Dates: The date range for the subject(s) contained in the archival materials. For example, a series created in the 1970s about the 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor would have Coverage Dates of 1941 and Inclusive Dates of 1970-1979. The date may be qualified by a "ca." to indicate if the date is approximate or a "?" if an uncertainty exists regarding the date. Further explanation of the dates may appear in Date Note.

Creator: The name of the person or organization responsible for the creation, accumulation, or maintenance of a series of archival materials when it was in working (primary) use. For organizations, the Establish Date and Abolish Date (if applicable) will appear. For people, the Birth Date and Death Date (if applicable) will appear. People and organizations that contributed to the authorship of the series or its smaller parts, such as individual documents or reports, are called Contributors. Creators can be either Most Recent or Predecessor creators.

Custodial History Note: A description of the ownership history of the archival materials from the time of their creation to the time of their accessioning by NARA. This information may be particularly important for donated materials or for federal records that come to NARA outside the regular government records transfer process. It can provide information on changes of ownership or breaks in the government chain-of-custody that is significant for the authenticity, integrity, and interpretation of the archival materials.

Data Element: See field.

Data Field: See field.

Data Files: 1) A structured collection of data that is stored together and treated as a unit by a computer. 2) Related data (numeric, textual, or graphic information) and fields that are organized in a strictly prescribed form and format. Examples of data files include databases, spreadsheets, and email. Data files are not the same as textual documents recorded on electronic media.

Data Layout: A description of the way the data is structured in the data file. The data layout is composed of a list of all the field names, field titles, data types, start position, and width. The AAD data layouts include links to code lists, and field specific notes.

Data Table: The organization of information into a group that is presented in rows and fields. Each row represents a person, place or thing described by the table. The fields are the columns or elements of information that describe each row. The data layout lists the characteristics that govern the creation and representation of the logical data records in the data table.

Data Type: Character or numeric specific formats and values allowed within each specific field. Data types in AAD are alphanumeric, date, and numeric.

Date Note: Provides more information about one or more of the dates in the description. This note might explain date spans for which there are a lot of archival materials (sometimes called "bulk dates") or point out gaps, or it might explain why there are multiple dates in the description.

Description: 1) The process of analyzing, organizing, and recording information that serves to identify, manage, locate, and explain the holdings of archives and manuscript repositories and the contexts and record systems from which those holdings were selected; 2) the written representation or products of the above process. Archival materials are described hierarchically using different levels of description. The archival principles of provenance and original order call for the description of series of archival materials before describing at the file unit or item level. Descriptions of series provide a unified overview of the archival materials to help you understand the context of the individual file units and items within a given series of archival materials.

Documentation Package: See Technical Information.

Electronic Record: A record that is created, transmitted, received, or stored in digital format. See Record.

End Position: The position within a record that indicates where the contents of a specific column end.

Establish Date: The date on which an organization was established. The date may be qualified by a "ca." to indicate if the date is approximate or a "?" if an uncertainty exists regarding the date.

Extent: The measurement or amount of the archival materials themselves - the number of data files and the linear measurement and page count of the creator's documentation - that make up the particular copy of the materials.

Field: An element of information in the same position for every record within a data file. Used interchangeably with "data element" and "data field."

Field Name: The term or abbreviated name the creator gave to a field. Where this name is a word that the AAD operating system reserves for special operations, NARA has added additional characters. For example, the field name DATE has been changed to DATE_1.

Field Title: The full name or description given by the creator to a field. Occasionally, the field name and the field title are the same.

Fielded Search: An AAD search that is limited to a specific field within a specific file.

File Unit: An organized unit of archival materials grouped together either for current use or in the process of archival arrangement. A file unit is the intellectual grouping of the archival materials, which may or may not equal the physical grouping. For the electronic records in AAD, a file unit is synonymous with a data file, or file.

Finding Aid(s): Tools that help you find information in archival materials. There are many different types of finding aids including published or unpublished inventories, container and folder lists, card catalogs, calendars, indexes, registers, databases, technical information packages, or institutional guides. Finding aids can be formal publications or accessioned archival materials.

Free-text Search: An AAD search for words in all of the fields or their meanings in the records of one or more files.

Function and Use: A description of the activities that resulted in the creation of the archival materials. This information explains why the archival materials were created.

General Note: Significant information not captured in any other field.

Inclusive Dates: The date range during which the record group, collection, or series was created, maintained, or accumulated by its creator. The date may be qualified by a "ca." to indicate if the date is approximate or a "?" if an uncertainty exists regarding the date. Further explanation of the dates may appear in Date Note.

Index Terms: Uniform terms used to describe the topics, people, organizations, and geographic areas that are the subject of or contributed in some way to the archival materials.

Item: The smallest intellectually indivisible archival unit (e.g. a letter, memorandum, report, leaflet, logical data record or photograph).

Level of Description: Materials are described according to their position within the archival hierarchy. The materials are first described as groups, and depending on available resources and access needs, also described down to the item. The two highest levels are record group and collection. Record groups and collections contain series. Series contain file units and/or items, and file units contain items. AAD includes series and file unit descriptions. AAD does not contain item level descriptions.

Logical Data Record: A set of data processed as a unit by a computer system or application independently of its physical environment. Examples include a word processing document, a spreadsheet, an email message, each row in each table of a relational database, and each record in an independent logical data file.

Most Recent: Indicates that the creator is the one last responsible for the archival materials' creation, accumulation, or maintenance. If the creator were the one first or previously responsible for the creation, accumulation, or maintenance of the archival materials, this type would be Predecessor.

NARA Note: Information provided by NARA to assist you in understanding the contents of a field.

Notes: Narrative information found in AAD that describes or explains a data table, a colum, or specific fields. A note can be provided either by the creating organization (Agency Note) or by NARA (NARA Note).

Numbering Note: The explanation of an agency or NARA-assigned numbering scheme. May also include instructions for how you should cite a specific sequence, format, or content of the numbering scheme when requesting the archival materials.

Operators: See Search Operators.

Other Title: Additional or variant titles by which the archival materials are known.

Parent Field: A field that has a second field whose meaning is contingent upon it. You must select a value in this parent data field first in order to find a value or values for the secondary (or child) field.

Predecessor: 1) In the description of archival materials, indicates that the creator is the one first or previously responsible for the archival materials' creation, accumulation, or maintenance. If the creator was the one last responsible for the creation, accumulation, or maintenance of the archival materials, this type would be Most Recent; 2) In the organization description, the name of the organization that previously had the mission or program areas of a successor organization.

Record: All books, papers, maps, photographs, machine-readable materials, or other documentary materials, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by an agency of the United States Government under federal law or in connection with the transaction of public business and preserved or appropriate for preservation by that agency or its legitimate successor as evidence of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, operations, or other activities of the government or because of the informational value of data in them. See also Logical Data Record.

Record Group: A grouping created by NARA that comprises the records of a large organization, such as a government bureau or independent agency.

Record Group Number: A unique number assigned to each record group.

Reference Unit: The NARA unit that provides reference services for the archival materials.

RG: See Record Group.

Sample Values: A display of the first 20 distinct values from the first 1,000 records for a field that you can use to see examples of the data in the field.

Scope and Content Note: A narrative description summarizing what the archival materials are (their scope) and what kinds of information they contain (their content).

Search Operators: Search operators are used to define searches of a field in a data table. The search operators available differ depending on the data type of the field being searched. Some examples of search operators include WITH ALL OF THE VALUES, WITH ANY OF THE VALUES, WITH THE EXACT PHRASE, EQUALS, and BETWEEN. You can use either a % or a * for a wildcard with some of the AAD search operators. A complete list, along with definitions and examples, is available in AAD Help.

Series: File units or items arranged in accordance with a filing system or maintained as a unit because they are from the same accumulation or filing process, the same function, or the same activity; have a particular form; or because of some other relationship arising out of their creation, receipt, or use.

Start Position: The position within a record that indicates where the contents of a specific field begin.

Table: See Data Table.

Technical Information: A NARA-created compilation of text-based materials needed to understand a series or file unit. May include materials produced by the creator and NARA, such as a listing of the contents, data layouts, manuals, user notes, and publications. For AAD some technical information packages and parts of technical information packages have been digitally scanned and are made available as PDF files.

Title: The name assigned to the archival materials. At the record group, collection, and series level, NARA almost always creates the title. At the file unit level, the creator usually supplies the title. NARA-assigned titles may be indicated by brackets, or may appear in the Other Title field.

Type of Archival Materials: The general form of the archival materials. Currently this may be Architectural and Engineering Drawings, Artifacts, Data Files, Maps and Charts, Moving Images, Photographs and Other Graphic Materials, Sound Recordings, or Textual Records.

Values: The content of a column in a specific record within a data file. Its meaning may be apparent, or it may be coded, e.g. M = male and F = female in a field identifying Gender.

Variant Control Number: A number or identifier assigned to the archival materials either by the creator or by NARA. Each variant control number will be identified by type and may have a note providing more information.



For additional help in AAD please see What help is available for me?



Elyssa D. Durant 
Research & Policy Analyst
Columbia University, New York

MIT scientists create weird psychopath obsessed AI named Norman

MIT scientists create weird psychopath obsessed AI named Norman
Proper name for a psychopath. 

I'll have to make a list!! 

Ryan M Ryan B  
Fred Bond James Bond



MIT scientists create weird psychopath obsessed AI named Norman

Artificial intelligence
Pixabay

People who oppose the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) in all sectors of our lives have long been criticizing the misuse of technology and now it has been proved that their worst fear may one day come true. To expose the dangers of AI, scientists at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) have programmed an AI algorithm by just exposing it to the gruesome contents available in Reddit and they have named it Norman. This AI was named after the character of Norman Bates from the classic Hollywood movie 'Psycho'.

Due to its violent programming nature, Norman sees death in everywhere and it almost acts like a psychopath obsessed with murders. During the research, scientists carried out the Rorschach inkblot test, where they showed the same image to the murder-obsessed AI and a normal AI.

After analyzing the images, Norman develops some spooky and spine-chilling comments. While a normally programmed AI sees birds sitting on the top of a tree branch, Norman sees it as a man gets electrocuted and catches to death. In the same manner, in another image, the normal AI sees a black and white bird, a man with an umbrella and a wedding cake, but Norman sees deaths, gunshots and more blood spilling events.

The research was carried out by three scientists at the MIT; Pinar Yanardag, Manuel Cebrian and Iyad Rahwan. The primary aim of the research program was to prove that the training process of an AI can directly impact its behaviour. The research also tries to expose the dangers of artificial intelligence when biased data is used in machine learning algorithms.

The new research findings indicate that AI is fed with good information and human sympathies, then it could emerge as a real boon for humankind.

However, several top personalities including Elon Musk had openly criticized the advent of AI recently. As per Elon Musk, it is more dangerous than the nukes of North Korea and he even urged authorities to frame strict rules and regulations while managing AI-powered bots.



Elyssa D. Durant 
Research & Policy Analyst
Columbia University, New York

Apple Bars Apps from Scraping Address Books and Spamming Contacts | Fortune

Apple Bars Apps from Scraping Address Books and Spamming Contacts | Fortune
Who can I sue first? 




Apple Bars Apps from Scraping Address Books and Spamming Contacts

Developers of apps for Apple's iPhone and iPad can no longer harvest contacts, photos, and other user data stored on a device with their app installed and create databases of contact information for their own use, according to a recent update by Apple to its App Store Review Guidelines.

This new explicit guidance, published on June 4, doesn't put a technical bar in place. Rather, it informs developers that they can't collect information from their users about friends, family, colleagues, and connections except for a purpose designed for that user within that app. The guidelines also prohibit selling or distributing such data to third parties.

The iOS contacts list can contain an array of information about someone, depending on how fully a user has fleshed out details. Birthdate, a photo, the person's spouse and children, multiple addresses, and other information can all be stored—and retrieved by developers.

The revised guidelines also state that apps can't contact other people using information retrieved from a user's contacts or photos without requiring explicit individual permission from the user for each message. It specifically prohibits a "Select All option or default…selection of all contacts." And the messages must make clear the form in which they're sent, such as who the sender will be appear to be.

While these updates came during Apple's annual Worldwide Developer Conference, a gathering of thousands of programmers who develop software for its platforms, the company didn't announce it or otherwise highlight it. Bloomberg first noticed the change.

It might surprise iOS users that no prohibition existed against companies collecting information and retaining it, although Apple has required disclosures about what data was collected and how it was used, and the Federal Trade Commission offers the same advice.

Apple enforces rules like this prospectively. So far, there are no reports of developers asked to purge databases. But any app update submitted will have to conform to the new rules, although Apple has granted temporary exceptions in the past for some of its guideline updates, particularly for established and trusted apps and companies.

The company's app review process involves a combination of automated and human review of code and behavior, and any app that asks for permission for user data, like contacts, will obviously receive additional scrutiny if it sends the data to a server. Some apps rely on a user's contacts to avoid marking email, text messages, or phone calls as spam, such as call-blocking apps that can mark incoming calls as from a marketer or as fraud.



Elyssa D. Durant 
Research & Policy Analyst
Columbia University, New York

Sunday, June 17, 2018

Broken Beyond Repair

Apparently this needs to be said... I would never threaten suicide or use that as a way to manipulate you. Aside from what I said earlier (that I wouldn't tell anyone give someone the opportunity to stop me) I would NEVER leave you or anyone else feeling guilty or responsible if I ever were to make that decision. That is beyond cruel and I am not a cruel person but some things you said yesterday have left me wondering if you even know me at all.

The reason I mentioned it yesterday is because you made it seem like the reason you abandoned me back in 2000 was because I didn't love you. You accused me of using sex to manipulate you; you spent countless nights somewhere else, you left without saying goodbye and came in without saying hello. You put a lock on your bedroom door and Treated me like I was a stranger. You didn't speak to me for months and never acknowledged me ôr gave a moment'a thought to what that did to me. I turned my life upside down for you and you treated me with utter contempt and disregard. You either had no idea what that did to me or didn't care.

You say it hurt you as much as it hurt me when we broke up but now I learn that you met someone else, fell in love and were married within two years. It'd been 16 years and I still can't reflect on it without breaking down in tears Into a complete emotional mess.

So, no! It did not hurt you as much as it hurt me. You moved on a year later. I never managed to move on at all.

And when you called me back yesterday to say you felt bad that you didn't say, "I love you" back when I said it to you, you spent several minutes telling me how hard it is to be in love with two people. So calling me back just drove the knife deeper in my back.

You didn't call me to tell me that you love me at all. If that were the case you would have just said it. You
called me back to emphasize how much you love HER. Something I already know and could have done without hearing it another four or five times.

I've told you this before. So I need to ask, were you trying to hurt me? Is that your end game? To keel hurting me time and time again so I am left with no other choice but to walk away? So I am the one to leave this time and not you?

Would that make it easier for you if I am the one to cut you off this time the way you did to me?

You said you don't want to hurt me but you already have more times than I can count. You sent me a message in the hospital telling me you were worried and to let you know if I was okay.

When I was finally able to get back to you five days later, you had no response. No words of joy, relief, not a hint of encouragement or anything else. And nothing further for the next three months I was in the hospital.

How do you think that made me feel???

How do you think it made me feel when you called me back yesterday not to tell me that you loved me but that you loved her.

So that bit about all the soul searching you did after we broke up was just more bullshit. You met someone right after leaving me in the dark with no electric, heat or power and just a mattress on the floor and Pepe, walked out without saying goodbye and got right into a relationship and married the next person you met.

So you want me to be the one to close the door this time? To finally, FINALLY realize that loving you has and continues to bring me incredible, all consuming, devastating pain on a daily basis so you don't have to live with the guilt of leaving me completely, irrevocably broken yet again?

That may be what you want but it most definitely isn't what either of us deserve. You owe me an apology. And you need to man up and do the right thing. Stop pushing me away. So the right thing this time. Say goodbye and tell me why.

You broke my heart again. You manage to do that over and over again all the time telling me that you love me. Giving me just enough hope to hold on to an impossible dream. One you knew was over 15 years ago.

I have to wonder what could have possibly done to you then and now that made you feel I deserved to be treated with such obvious contempt and total disregard.

How did I hurt you SO BADLY that toying with my emotions and giving me just enough hope to close myself off from the world was justifiable revenge?

I'm broken. Time and time again you treated me like I wasn't worthy of your time, your attention, your love, an apology, an explanation or even a goodbye. It would be ridiculous for me to expect any of those things mow.

And after 30 years of this, I finally believe you. And know what to expect in return. Absolutely nothing.


Elyssa D. Durant
Research & Policy Analyst
Columbia University, New York